Republication of a Will UK: How a Codicil Re-dates Your Will and What Changes
Updated 31 May 2026 · 8 min read · Wills & Estate Planning
When you execute a codicil — a supplementary amendment to your will — you do more than change or add a specific provision. You also republish your will, re-dating it as at the codicil’s execution date. That shift in date has real consequences: it changes which documents can be incorporated by reference, which beneficiaries fall within a class description, and in some cases whether a witness’s gift is saved or forfeited. Understanding republication is essential for anyone who has made a will and is considering amending it.
What Is Republication?
Republication is the doctrine by which a will is treated as having been re-made on a date later than its original execution. The will’s contents do not change (except to the extent the codicil amends them), but its deemed date shifts forward to the codicil’s date. The testator is treated as having re-affirmed and re-published the will as at the codicil’s execution.
The doctrine is recognised both at common law and under the Wills Act 1837. Section 34 of that Act confirms that a will ‘shall be construed to speak and take effect as if it had been executed immediately before the death of the testator’ — but where republication moves the deemed date forward, courts apply the republication date for purposes of class descriptions, incorporation, and witness gifts.
Express and Implied Republication
Republication may be express or implied:
- Express republication occurs when the codicil contains words such as “I confirm and republish my will dated [date]” or “in all other respects I confirm my said will.” This leaves no ambiguity about the testator’s intent.
- Implied republication occurs when the codicil modifies or supplements the will without an express confirmation clause. Courts have consistently held that any valid codicil that deals with the will’s contents implicitly republishes and confirms it as at the codicil’s date.
In practice, most professionally drafted codicils include an express confirmation clause to avoid any uncertainty, but the doctrine operates even without one.
Republication and After-Acquired Property
A will speaks from death: it generally disposes of all property the testator owns at the date of their death. But where the will contains a class gift defined by reference to property held at a particular time — or a gift of “my shares in X company” which the testator sold and repurchased — the date from which the will speaks can affect what falls within the gift.
Republication can be used deliberately to bring after-acquired property within a class or specific gift by moving the will’s reference date forward. Testators and their advisers should be alert to this when using codicils to make minor changes: the republication effect may unintentionally alter which property passes under a specific gift.
Republication and Class Gifts
A class gift — a gift to “my children”, “my grandchildren who reach 21”, or “my employees at the date of my death” — is construed as at the will’s deemed date in some respects. Republication by codicil can widen or narrow the class if additional members come into existence between the original will date and the codicil date.
The clearest case is adoption: a child adopted after the original will was made but before the codicil was executed may be included within a class gift to “my children” as a result of republication, even if they would not have been included under the original will date. Similarly, an employee who joined the company after the will was made but before the codicil might be included within a gift to “my employees.”
This is rarely the testator’s intent when executing a codicil to change an unrelated provision. Careful drafting — specifying names rather than class descriptions, or including a fixed class-closing date — avoids unintended beneficiaries being included by the republication effect.
Republication and Incorporation by Reference
A will can incorporate an unexecuted document (a schedule, a list, a memorandum) only if the document was in existence when the will was made. A letter of wishes written two years after the will cannot be incorporated by the original will — it postdates the will’s execution.
But if a codicil is subsequently executed and republishes the will, the will is treated as re-made on the codicil date. If the letter of wishes existed before the codicil (but after the original will), it may now qualify for incorporation by reference — it predates the (republished) will date. Testators who want to incorporate a list of personal chattels or a memorandum of wishes should time the execution of the codicil carefully to ensure the document they want incorporated is in existence before the codicil is signed.
FAQs
What does republication of a will mean?
Republication is the act of confirming and re-publishing a will so that it is treated in law as having been made on the date of the republishing instrument — not the date on which the original will was signed. Republication has the effect of updating the will's date without requiring a completely new will to be drafted and executed. It applies the original will's terms to the testator's circumstances as they stand at the date of republication. The doctrine is well established in English law and is codified (indirectly) in section 34 of the Wills Act 1837, which preserves the effect of a codicil confirming a will and gives the confirmed will effect from the date of the codicil in certain contexts.
How does a codicil republish a will?
A codicil republishes a will in two main ways. First, by express republication: the codicil contains words such as 'I confirm and republish my said will dated [date]' or 'in all other respects I confirm my said will'. Courts treat this as a deliberate act of republication, treating the will as re-made on the codicil's date. Second, by implied republication: even without an express confirmation clause, any codicil that modifies or supplements a will is treated as republishing and confirming the will as it stands after the modification, bringing the whole instrument (will as amended by codicil) into effect as at the date of the codicil. A codicil must itself comply with the formal requirements of the Wills Act 1837: signed by the testator in the presence of two independent witnesses who sign in the testator's presence.
What is the effect of republication on the date of the will?
The key practical consequence of republication is that the will is treated as having been made on the date of the codicil. This matters in several situations. (1) After-acquired property: a will normally operates on property the testator owned at death, but the class of 'my property' is determined as at the date the will is treated as made. Republication can bring after-acquired property within a class that might otherwise have excluded it. (2) Beneficiary identification: references to 'my eldest child' or 'my employees' are construed as at the will's deemed date — republication moves that date forward, potentially changing who falls within the class. (3) Incorporation by reference: a will can incorporate an unexecuted document only if it was in existence at the date the will was made. Republication by codicil can bring a document that post-dates the original will within the scope of incorporation if it existed before the codicil. (4) Witness gifts: see separate FAQ below.
How does republication affect gifts to attesting witnesses?
Under section 15 of the Wills Act 1837, a gift to a person who was a witness to the will is void — the witness loses their benefit to preserve the will's validity. Republication by codicil interacts with this rule in an important way: if a codicil republishes the will, and the codicil is witnessed by a person who was also a witness to the original will, the gift to that witness in the original will is not automatically saved — the witness is still a witness to the republished will. However, republication by codicil can operate in the other direction too: if person X was a witness to the original will and received a gift in it, but person X did not witness the codicil that republishes the will, the courts have sometimes held that the republication treats the will as re-made on the codicil date — when X was not a witness — potentially saving X's gift. This is a technical and contested area; specialist advice is essential if a witness has received a gift.
What is incorporation by reference and how does republication affect it?
Incorporation by reference is the principle by which a will can include the contents of an extrinsic unexecuted document, provided the document was in existence at the date the will was made, the will refers to it with sufficient certainty, and the will shows the intention to incorporate it. Common examples include a separate memorandum of wishes, a schedule of specific gifts, or a list of personal chattels. The strict rule is that the document must predate the will — a document that postdates the will cannot be incorporated by the original will. However, if a codicil is subsequently executed that republishes the will, and the previously excluded document existed before the codicil date, the republication moves the will's deemed date forward to the codicil date. This can bring the later document within the scope of incorporation by reference. Testators who maintain updated lists of personal property or letter of wishes should be aware of this interaction and consider whether periodic codicils or re-execution of the will is the cleanest solution.
How does republication differ from revival under the Wills Act 1837?
Republication and revival are distinct concepts and are easily confused. Republication applies to a will that is still valid and has not been revoked: it confirms and re-dates the will without changing its fundamental legal status. Revival under section 22 of the Wills Act 1837, by contrast, applies to a will that has already been revoked: it brings a revoked will back into legal effect. A revoked will cannot be revived simply by revoking the later will that replaced it — section 22 requires either re-execution of the revoked will (signing and witnessing it again as if it were new) or a codicil that shows a clear intention to revive it and is itself duly executed. A mere confirmation codicil cannot revive a revoked will; there must be a positive intent to revive. Getting this distinction wrong can leave a testator with no valid will at all, making clear legal advice essential before destroying or revoking any will document.
Update Your Will with Confidence
Understanding when to use a codicil versus a new will is important. WillSafe’s DIY will kit for England and Wales includes guidance on amending your will safely — including when republication effects matter.
Start Your Will ›