Trustee Act 2000 Investment Powers UK: Standard Investment Criteria, Review Duty and Advice
Updated 31 May 2026 · 9 min read · Trusts & Estate Planning
When a will creates a trust — for children, a surviving spouse, or disabled beneficiaries — the trustees need a legal framework for managing the trust fund. The Trustee Act 2000 provides that framework, giving trustees broad investment powers while imposing clear duties to apply standard criteria, review regularly, and take professional advice. Understanding how these rules work matters both for trustees who manage will trusts and for testators who want to ensure their trust is properly set up.
The General Power of Investment
Section 3 of the Trustee Act 2000 gives trustees a general power of investment — the power to make any investment that an absolute beneficial owner could make. This replaced the old Trustee Investments Act 1961 regime, which confined trustees to a ‘legal list’ of safe investments (government stock and similar) unless the trust deed gave wider powers.
Under the 2000 Act, trustees can invest in UK and overseas equities, corporate bonds, property funds, commodities, alternative investments, and cash — without any express authorising clause. The only exclusion from the general power is direct investment in land, which is covered separately by the power to acquire land in section 8. Both powers apply to trusts created before the Act as well as after, unless the trust deed restricts them.
The Standard Investment Criteria
Wide investment powers do not mean unconstrained investment. Section 4 TA 2000 requires trustees to apply the standard investment criteria — two interlocking tests — both when making new investments and when reviewing existing ones:
- Suitability: Is this particular investment suitable for this trust? Relevant factors include the trust’s size and duration, whether it is an income trust (needing yield) or a growth trust, the ages and financial circumstances of the beneficiaries, and any ethical restrictions in the trust deed.
- Diversification: Is the portfolio adequately spread across different assets, sectors, and geographies to avoid an undue concentration of risk? Holding 90% of a trust fund in a single company’s shares, for example, is unlikely to satisfy this criterion for a moderate-sized trust.
Trustees are judged against an objective standard — what a reasonably prudent person managing the investments of another would do. In Nestlé v National Westminster Bank plc [1994] 1 WLR 1260, the court confirmed that failure to apply these criteria and review accordingly could constitute a breach of trust, even if the bank was not ultimately liable on the facts.
The Duty to Obtain Investment Advice
Before making or reviewing investments, section 5 TA 2000 requires trustees to obtain and consider proper advice from a person reasonably believed to be qualified to give it — typically an FCA-regulated financial adviser. The adviser must specifically address whether the proposed investment is satisfactory in light of the standard investment criteria; generic market commentary is insufficient.
The duty to take advice can be waived only where the trustee reasonably concludes it is unnecessary or inappropriate — for example, where the trust fund is very small and advice costs would be disproportionate, or where the decision is wholly uncontentious (a cash transfer to a higher-interest account). Trustees who invest without advice and later face a loss must demonstrate that a reasonable trustee would also have concluded advice was unnecessary — a difficult argument for complex or high-risk investments.
The Review Duty
Section 4(2) TA 2000 requires trustees to review the investment portfolio ‘from time to time’. There is no statutory interval — reasonableness depends on the nature of the trust and its assets. Practical benchmarks:
- An actively managed equity portfolio: at least annually, with ad-hoc reviews when markets shift significantly
- A deposit-based or bond-heavy portfolio: annually, checking interest rates and credit quality
- A single-asset trust (e.g. a rental property): annually for rent level and condition; more frequently if the asset is falling in value
Each review must revisit the suitability and diversification criteria and consider whether the current investments remain appropriate. Proper advice is required on the review as well as on new investments, subject to the same ‘unnecessary or inappropriate’ exception. Trustees should document review decisions — the date, what was considered, what advice was taken, and what action was taken or not taken and why.
How a Will Can Modify the Default Powers
Section 6 TA 2000 allows the trust deed (or will) to restrict or expand the statutory powers:
- Restriction: A will can limit trustees to a narrower class of investment — government gilts and cash only, for example. Courts will enforce such restrictions strictly.
- Expansion: A will can authorise trustees to invest in unquoted shares, loans to beneficiaries, or alternative assets — investments that the standard criteria might make difficult to justify without express authority.
- Ethical clauses: A will can require trustees to avoid particular sectors (weapons, tobacco). Trustees must still achieve a reasonable return; ethical restrictions cannot be so wide as to paralyse the portfolio.
- Advice modification: A will can modify the advice obligation, though courts scrutinise this carefully for high-risk trusts.
For family trusts created by will, professional drafting of the investment clause is important. A clause that neither restricts nor expands simply leaves the statutory default in place — which is usually adequate, but professional advisers may recommend bespoke wording for larger or more complex estates.
Personal Liability for Breach
A trustee who breaches the investment duties — by investing without proper criteria, failing to review, or ignoring required advice — is personally liable to compensate the trust fund for the loss caused. Equitable compensation restores the trust to the position it would have been in but for the breach.
Protection against liability involves: documenting all investment decisions and the criteria applied; obtaining and filing written advice; holding regular, minuted reviews; and maintaining appropriate diversification. Where a trustee acts honestly and reasonably, they can apply for relief from personal liability under section 61 of the Trustee Act 1925, which gives the court a discretion to excuse a trustee entirely or in part.
FAQs
What investment powers does the Trustee Act 2000 give trustees?
Section 3 of the Trustee Act 2000 (TA 2000) gives trustees a 'general power of investment' — the power to make any kind of investment that a person who is the absolute beneficial owner of the trust fund could make. This replaces the old 'legal list' approach under the Trustee Investments Act 1961, which confined trustees to government stock and other narrowly prescribed assets unless the trust deed expanded those powers. Under the 2000 Act, trustees can invest in equities (including overseas shares), bonds, property funds, commodities, alternative investments, and cash deposits without needing an express authorising clause in the trust deed. The only investment type excluded from the default power is investment in land: that requires a separate power under section 8 TA 2000, which is also conferred by default but is technically separate from the section 3 general investment power. The general power of investment applies to trusts created before and after the 2000 Act, unless the trust deed expressly restricts it.
What are the standard investment criteria under the Trustee Act 2000?
Before exercising any power of investment, and when reviewing existing investments, trustees must have regard to the 'standard investment criteria' set out in section 4 TA 2000. There are two: (1) the suitability of the proposed investment — whether a particular investment is suitable for this trust, in light of its size, term, and the beneficiaries' interests (for example, an income-producing portfolio is more suitable for a life interest trust than a growth-only fund); and (2) the need for diversification — whether the portfolio as a whole is sufficiently spread across asset types, sectors, and geographies to avoid an undue concentration of risk in a single asset or class. Section 4(2) requires trustees to consider these criteria both when making new investments and when reviewing the existing investment portfolio at appropriate intervals. Courts apply an objective standard: trustees are judged against what a reasonably prudent person managing the investments of another would do, applying the same criteria (Nestlé v National Westminster Bank [1994]).
Must trustees obtain investment advice before investing?
Yes — in most cases. Section 5 TA 2000 requires trustees to obtain and consider proper advice before exercising any power of investment (other than a cash deposit), and before carrying out a review of the investment portfolio. 'Proper advice' is advice given by a person reasonably believed by the trustee to be qualified to give it — in practice, a regulated financial adviser (FCA-authorised) or the trustee's solicitor for matters of trust law. The duty to take advice can be dispensed with only where the trustee reasonably concludes that obtaining advice is unnecessary or inappropriate in the circumstances: for example, where the trust fund is very small and the cost of advice would be disproportionate, or where the investment decision is entirely obvious (moving cash to a higher-interest account). Trustees who invest without advice and the investment fails have no automatic defence; they must show that a reasonable trustee in the same circumstances would also have concluded that advice was unnecessary. Section 5(3) makes clear that 'proper advice' means advice on whether the investment is satisfactory having regard to the standard investment criteria, not merely generic market commentary.
How often must trustees review investments?
Section 4(2) TA 2000 requires trustees to review investments 'from time to time' — there is no prescribed interval. What is reasonable depends on the nature of the trust and its assets. A large discretionary trust with an actively managed equity portfolio should typically review at least annually; a small life interest trust holding a single deposit account may need less frequent review. Each review must assess suitability and diversification by reference to the standard investment criteria (section 4(1)), and the trustee must obtain proper advice about the review unless it is unnecessary or inappropriate (section 5(2)). Failure to review — for example, allowing a single shareholding to grow to represent 80% of the portfolio without questioning concentration risk — exposes trustees to personal liability for the loss caused. In Nestlé v National Westminster Bank plc [1994] 1 WLR 1260, the bank was found not liable on the facts but Dillon LJ confirmed that failure to apply the standard criteria and review the portfolio could constitute a breach of trust.
Can a will restrict or expand the Trustee Act 2000 investment powers?
Yes — section 6 TA 2000 makes the general power of investment subject to any restriction or exclusion in the trust deed (which, for a will trust, is the will itself). A testator can restrict the trustees to a narrower range of investments — for example, 'UK government gilts and UK cash deposits only' — or can expand the powers beyond the default, for example by authorising investment in unquoted shares, hedge funds, or loans to beneficiaries. Expansion clauses in wills are common in professionally drafted trusts. A will may also exclude or modify the duty to obtain advice (section 5), though courts will scrutinise such exclusions carefully where trustees invest in high-risk or illiquid assets without independent oversight. A will can also include an ethical investment clause — requiring trustees to avoid certain sectors — but trustees must still apply the standard investment criteria and cannot sacrifice returns so severely as to constitute a breach of the duty to act in the interests of all beneficiaries.
Are trustees personally liable if their investment decisions cause a loss?
Yes — a trustee who breaches the investment duty under the Trustee Act 2000 is personally liable to compensate the trust for any resulting loss. Breach can occur in three principal ways: (1) making an investment that fails the standard investment criteria at the time it is made; (2) failing to review investments at appropriate intervals; or (3) failing to obtain proper advice before investing or reviewing. The measure of compensation is equitable compensation — restoring the trust fund to the position it would have been in but for the breach. However, the beneficiary must prove causation: if the same loss would have occurred even if the trustee had obtained advice and followed it, the trustee may not be liable (Target Holdings v Redferns [1996]). Trustees can protect themselves by: obtaining and documenting proper investment advice; keeping records of review decisions and the reasoning behind them; diversifying appropriately; and, where the trust deed permits, obtaining a Trustee Act 1925 section 61 relief application if they acted honestly and reasonably.
Create a Will with Clear Trustee Powers
If your will creates a trust — for children, a partner, or a vulnerable beneficiary — the trustee investment and management provisions matter enormously. WillSafe’s DIY will kit for England and Wales includes guidance on trustee appointments and powers.
Start Your Will ›