Variation of Trusts Act 1958 UK: How Courts Approve Trust Restructuring
Updated 31 May 2026 · 9 min read · Trust Law & IHT Planning
The Variation of Trusts Act 1958 allows the court to approve changes to trust terms on behalf of those who cannot consent for themselves — minors, unborn beneficiaries, and persons lacking capacity. It is the principal statutory tool for restructuring will trusts to achieve IHT savings, remove outdated provisions, or improve trust administration decades after the testator’s death.
Why the Act Was Needed
Before the Variation of Trusts Act 1958, beneficiaries could end or vary a trust only by unanimous consent under the rule in Saunders v Vautier (1841). But Saunders v Vautier requires every person with a beneficial interest to consent — which is impossible where the class includes unborn grandchildren, minors, or persons lacking capacity.
The 1958 Act provided a solution: the court steps in as the representative of those who cannot speak for themselves, approving the variation on their behalf if it is for their benefit. Adult beneficiaries of full capacity consent directly; the court acts for everyone else. Together, the consents create the unanimous agreement that Saunders v Vautier requires — and the trust can be varied or ended.
Who Can the Court Give Consent For?
Under VTA 1958 s.1, the court may give approval on behalf of:
- Minors — persons under 18 who have a vested or contingent interest.
- Persons lacking mental capacity — who are unable to consent because of incapacity.
- Unborn persons — who may in the future become entitled under the trust.
- Persons with discretionary or protective interests — beneficiaries of a protective trust (TA 1925 s.33) who have a contingent interest in the discretionary phase.
The court cannot give consent on behalf of adult beneficiaries of full capacity who refuse to agree — those persons must consent themselves. If an adult beneficiary refuses, the application fails unless their interest can be separately isolated and the variation proceeds without them.
The ‘Benefit’ Requirement
The court will only approve the variation if it is for the benefit of those on whose behalf it consents. In Re Weston’s Settlements [1969] 1 Ch 223, the Court of Appeal confirmed that “benefit” means more than financial benefit: the court should consider the overall welfare and social interest of the beneficiaries — not merely the IHT saving produced by the proposed variation.
In practice, most applications succeed on financial benefit grounds:
- Actuarial evidence showing that the net present value of the tax saving to unborn and minor beneficiaries exceeds any reduction in their immediate entitlement.
- Expert evidence of improved investment performance or reduced management costs.
- Evidence that the variation removes an injustice or anomaly in the existing trust terms.
The court will not approve a variation that is purely for the benefit of adult beneficiaries at the expense of unborn or minor beneficiaries — there must be a genuine benefit flowing to those on whose behalf consent is given.
Common Uses in Practice
IHT Restructuring
The most common use of the VTA 1958 is to restructure an existing will trust to save IHT — by converting a relevant property trust into direct interests, varying the class of beneficiaries, adding a power of advancement, or rearranging multiple trusts. The court approves on behalf of unborn grandchildren on evidence that the restructuring benefits them financially through tax savings that augment the eventual fund they will receive.
Removing Outdated Restrictions
A Victorian or Edwardian trust might contain restrictions on investment, prohibitions on accumulation, or trust terms that make no sense in the modern world. The VTA 1958 allows those terms to be removed or modernised with court approval.
Adding Trustee Powers
A trust that was created before the Trustee Act 2000 might lack adequate investment powers, powers of delegation, or powers of advancement. The VTA 1958 can be used to add or expand those powers — often with the same practical effect as a Trustee Act 1925 s.57 application (which covers specific management and administration issues) but with broader scope.
VTA 1958 vs Deed of Variation
| Feature | VTA 1958 Application | Deed of Variation (IHTA s.142) |
|---|---|---|
| What it varies | Existing trust terms | Initial distribution of an estate |
| Time limit | None — can be done at any time | 2 years from death for IHT/CGT treatment |
| Court approval required | Yes — for minors/unborn/incapacitated | Not normally — adult consent only |
| Benefit test | Required for those on whose behalf court consents | Not a formal court test |
FAQs
What does the Variation of Trusts Act 1958 do?
The Variation of Trusts Act 1958 (VTA 1958) gives the court power to approve a proposed arrangement varying the trusts of a settlement on behalf of persons who cannot consent for themselves — principally minors, unborn or unascertained beneficiaries, and persons lacking mental capacity. Before the Act, if any beneficiary could not give informed consent (including future grandchildren not yet born), the trust terms could not be varied unless all existing adult beneficiaries collectively invoked Saunders v Vautier — which was only possible if no future interests existed. The VTA 1958 provides a statutory gateway: adults consent themselves; the court consents on behalf of those who cannot. The court will give consent on behalf of those persons only if the variation is for their 'benefit' — a concept that has been interpreted broadly by the courts to include financial benefit, social benefit, moral benefit, and in some cases benefits that are indirect or future. Once approved, the variation binds all parties including those on whose behalf the court consented.
Who can apply under the Variation of Trusts Act 1958?
An application under the VTA 1958 is made by originating application in the Chancery Division of the High Court (or in the Family Court if the matter involves children's trusts). Those who may apply include: any trustee of the settlement, any beneficiary of the settlement, and (in limited cases) the settlor. The application must set out the proposed arrangement, identify all existing and potential beneficiaries, and explain why the variation is for the benefit of those on whose behalf consent is being given. Beneficiaries under a legal disability who cannot consent themselves are the classes listed in s.1 VTA 1958: (a) minors or those who would be capable of assigning their interest if they were of full age; (b) persons who lack capacity; (c) persons unborn; (d) persons who are ascertained future beneficiaries with a vested or contingent interest under a protective trust (under Trustee Act 1925 s.33). The court does not have jurisdiction to approve the variation on behalf of adult persons of full capacity — they must consent themselves, or the application must wait or proceed without them if their interest can be separately dealt with.
What does 'benefit' mean under the Variation of Trusts Act 1958?
The requirement for 'benefit' in VTA 1958 s.1 has been interpreted broadly by the courts. The leading case is Re Weston's Settlements [1969] 1 Ch 223 (CA), where the Court of Appeal emphasised that 'benefit' is not limited to financial benefit and the court is not a rubber stamp for tax-saving schemes. Benefit can be: (1) Financial benefit — a restructuring that saves IHT or CGT, increases the expected return, or protects the fund from an identified risk; the most common basis in practice. (2) Social or moral benefit — restructuring that removes an injustice, cures an outdated provision, or improves family relationships. In Re Weston's, Denning MR held that the court should take into account the general welfare of the children — including being raised in England rather than Jersey — not just their financial position. (3) In Re CL [1969] 1 Ch 587, 'benefit' was held wide enough to include a variation that benefited a patient under the Mental Health Act even if the financial advantage to the patient was indirect. Variations that produce only a financial benefit for existing adult beneficiaries at the expense of unborn or minor beneficiaries will not be approved — there must be a net benefit to those on whose behalf the court consents, not merely a transfer of value from the weaker parties to the stronger.
How is the Variation of Trusts Act 1958 used for IHT planning?
The most common use of the VTA 1958 is to restructure existing will trusts to achieve IHT savings. Typical applications include: (1) Converting a relevant property (discretionary) trust into immediate post-death interests (IPDIs) or individual absolute interests for adult beneficiaries — which may reduce IHT periodic charges. (2) Extending an interest in possession trust's term to delay the end of the interest and defer the IHT entry. (3) Adding a power of advancement or power of appointment to an existing trust that lacks one — allowing distributions that reduce the relevant property fund and the associated IHT exposure. (4) Varying the class of beneficiaries to include wider family members who can be made to bear part of the IHT burden by receiving chargeable distributions. (5) Rearranging multiple trusts into a single consolidated trust to reduce administrative costs and the number of ten-year charges. The court will approve such variations if there is a genuine financial benefit to the minor and unborn beneficiaries — typically demonstrated by actuarial calculations of the net present value of the tax saving accruing to their interests compared to the cost of any reduction in their immediate entitlement.
What are the procedural steps for a VTA 1958 application?
The procedural steps for a Variation of Trusts Act 1958 application are: (1) Prepare the proposed arrangement — a document or deed setting out the precise variation proposed. (2) Identify all beneficiaries — all existing and potential beneficiaries under the trust must be identified. Those who are adults and of full capacity must consent by executing the arrangement themselves. (3) Instruct solicitors — a specialist Chancery solicitor is required; this is not straightforward DIY territory. (4) Prepare actuarial or financial evidence — particularly for IHT saving arguments, evidence of the financial benefit to unborn and minor beneficiaries is essential. (5) Issue an application in the Chancery Division — in practice, most straightforward VTA 1958 applications are dealt with on paper (without a hearing) if all parties consent and the benefit is clear; more complex or contested cases require a hearing. (6) Obtain the court order — once approved, the arrangement takes effect on a date specified in the order or on execution of the deed. (7) Execute the variation deed — all consenting parties execute the formal deed; the court order records the court's approval on behalf of those who cannot consent. The time and cost of a VTA 1958 application can be significant — typically £5,000–£20,000+ in legal costs depending on complexity.
What is the difference between the Variation of Trusts Act 1958 and a deed of variation?
A deed of variation (also called a deed of family arrangement) is a document by which beneficiaries of an estate vary the distribution of the estate after the deceased's death — redirecting their entitlement to different beneficiaries or into a trust. It operates under the inheritance tax and CGT concession in IHTA 1984 s.142 and TCGA 1992 s.62(6): a variation made within two years of death is treated for tax purposes as if the deceased had made that disposition. A deed of variation requires only the agreement of the adult beneficiaries who are giving up their entitlement — it does not require court approval (unless a minor's or incapacitated person's interest is being varied). The Variation of Trusts Act 1958, by contrast, varies the terms of an existing trust — usually a long-running settlement or will trust — rather than the initial distribution of an estate. It requires court approval, operates under the court's inherent equitable jurisdiction as supplemented by the Act, and is not subject to the two-year time limit that applies to deeds of variation under IHTA 1984 s.142.
Review Existing Trust Arrangements
If you are a beneficiary or trustee of an existing will trust and the terms no longer fit the family’s needs or the tax environment, the Variation of Trusts Act 1958 may offer a route to restructuring. Specialist Chancery solicitors can advise on whether an application is appropriate and what benefit evidence is needed.
Start Your Will ›